Results File
Dataset
File Header
Author(s):Schutt, A., Feydy, T., Stuckey, P.J., Wallace, M.G.
Reference:Schutt, A., Feydy, T., Stuckey, P. J., & Wallace, M. G. (2011). Explaining the cumulative propagator. Constraints, 16(3), 250-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10601-010-9103-2
Date: 2011/07/01
Hardware / software:X86-64 architecture running GNU/Linux and a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E54052 processor with 2 GHz. Code in Mercury using the G12 Constraint Programming Platform
Stop criteria(s):10 min, results reported in the paper as new results at the time of publication
Submission date: 2019/10/28
Statistics
Nothing changed since there are no new lower bounds, upper bounds nor optimal solutions.
Instances: 74
Optimal results: 28 (37.84%)
Upper Bounds: 28
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 15.44%
- over best LB: 0.00%
- over best UB: 0.00%
- Best Known: 28 (37.84%)
- Closed (using best LBs): 28 (37.84%)
- Sum of time units: 2971
Lower Bounds: 74
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 21.68%
- below best LB: 2.23%
- below best UB: 2.71%
- Best Known: 29 (39.19%)
- Closed (using best UBs): 29 (39.19%)
- Sum of time units: 8738
- Open time units:
- to LBs: 240 (2.67%)
- to UBs: 291 (3.22%)
Instances: 74
Optimal results: 28 (37.84%)
Upper Bounds: 28
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 15.44%
- over best LB: 0.00%
- over best UB: 0.00%
- Best Known: 28 (37.84%)
- Closed (using best LBs): 28 (37.84%)
- Sum of time units: 2971
Lower Bounds: 74
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 21.68%
- below best LB: 2.23%
- below best UB: 2.71%
- Best Known: 29 (39.19%)
- Closed (using best UBs): 29 (39.19%)
- Sum of time units: 8738
- Open time units:
- to LBs: 240 (2.67%)
- to UBs: 291 (3.22%)
Date