Results File
Dataset
File Header
Author(s):Schutt, A., Feydy, T., Stuckey, P.J., Wallace, M.G.
Reference:"Schutt, A., Feydy, T., Stuckey, P.J., Wallace, M.G. (2011) ""Explaining the cumulative propagator"". Constraints 16: 250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10601-010-9103-2"
Date: 2011/07/01
Hardware / software:X86-64 architecture running GNU/Linux and a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E54052 processor with 2 GHz. Code in Mercury using the G12 Constraint Programming Platform
Stop criteria(s):10 min, results reported in the paper as new results at the time of publication
Submission date: 2019/10/28
Statistics
Nothing changed since there are no new lower bounds, upper bounds nor optimal solutions.
Instances: 30
Optimal results: 18 (60.00%)
Upper Bounds: 18
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 24.10%
- over best LB: 0.00%
- over best UB: 0.00%
- Best Known: 18 (60.00%)
- Closed (using best LBs): 18 (60.00%)
- Sum of time units: 1929
Lower Bounds: 30
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 24.42%
- below best LB: 0.66%
- below best UB: 1.31%
- Best Known: 19 (63.33%)
- Closed (using best UBs): 18 (60.00%)
- Sum of time units: 3270
- Open time units:
- to LBs: 23 (0.70%)
- to UBs: 51 (1.54%)
Instances: 30
Optimal results: 18 (60.00%)
Upper Bounds: 18
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 24.10%
- over best LB: 0.00%
- over best UB: 0.00%
- Best Known: 18 (60.00%)
- Closed (using best LBs): 18 (60.00%)
- Sum of time units: 1929
Lower Bounds: 30
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 24.42%
- below best LB: 0.66%
- below best UB: 1.31%
- Best Known: 19 (63.33%)
- Closed (using best UBs): 18 (60.00%)
- Sum of time units: 3270
- Open time units:
- to LBs: 23 (0.70%)
- to UBs: 51 (1.54%)
Date