Results File
Dataset
File Header
Author(s):Schutt, A., Feydy, T., Stuckey, P.J., Wallace, M.G.
Reference:Schutt, A., Feydy, T., Stuckey, P. J., & Wallace, M. G. (2011). Explaining the cumulative propagator. Constraints, 16(3), 250-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10601-010-9103-2
Date: 2011/07/01
Hardware / software:X86-64 architecture running GNU/Linux and a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E54052 processor with 2 GHz. Code in Mercury using the G12 Constraint Programming Platform
Stop criteria(s):10 min, results reported in the paper as new results at the time of publication
Submission date: 2019/10/28
Statistics
Nothing changed since there are no new lower bounds, upper bounds nor optimal solutions.
Instances: 44
Optimal results: 24 (54.55%)
Upper Bounds: 24
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 25.02%
- over best LB: 0.00%
- over best UB: 0.00%
- Best Known: 24 (54.55%)
- Closed (using best LBs): 24 (54.55%)
- Sum of time units: 2219
Lower Bounds: 44
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 33.18%
- below best LB: 1.99%
- below best UB: 2.01%
- Best Known: 24 (54.55%)
- Closed (using best UBs): 24 (54.55%)
- Sum of time units: 4212
- Open time units:
- to LBs: 95 (2.21%)
- to UBs: 96 (2.23%)
Instances: 44
Optimal results: 24 (54.55%)
Upper Bounds: 24
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 25.02%
- over best LB: 0.00%
- over best UB: 0.00%
- Best Known: 24 (54.55%)
- Closed (using best LBs): 24 (54.55%)
- Sum of time units: 2219
Lower Bounds: 44
- Average deviations:
- over CPM: 33.18%
- below best LB: 1.99%
- below best UB: 2.01%
- Best Known: 24 (54.55%)
- Closed (using best UBs): 24 (54.55%)
- Sum of time units: 4212
- Open time units:
- to LBs: 95 (2.21%)
- to UBs: 96 (2.23%)
Date